Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity. The appellant shall be referred to by the initials MA throughout these proceedings.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant.
              The appellant appeals with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Chapman ('the judge'), dated 17 January 2024, dismissing the appellant's protection and human rights claim.
              The matter was listed for a listening appointment on 3 March 2025.
              On 19 May 2025, the respondent provided a response under 24 rule of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 ("Upper Tribunal Procedure Rules") accepting that the judge materially erred in law. The respondent accepts that the judge acted with procedural unfairness by finding that there was a lack of detail in the appellant's account without the appellant being afforded the opportunity to clarify and provide more detail on those issues.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.