Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, [the appellant] ( and/or any member of his family, expert, witness or other person the Tribunal considers should not be identified ) is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant ( and/or other person ). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
      The appeal came before the Upper Tribunal for re-making as a hearing de novo other than an argument relating to the Appellant's membership of a political party which had not been challenged.
      The Appellant gave evidence, with the assistance of a Mandarin interpreter and adopted her statements of 1 June 2020, 9 June 2022, corrections to her asylum interview record of 10 March 2022 and an updating statement of 20 May 2023.
      The Appellant confirmed that she was now divorced from her husband and that this had taken place after she left China and that he had divorced her via her older sister, who had organised the divorce. The Appellant said her second eldest sister still sees her son sometimes and that he remains living with his father, in Shenying city.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.