Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
         The appellant, a national of Botswana, born on 10 April 1986, appeals against a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Sweet (hereafter the "judge") who, in a decision promulgated on 17 June 2023 following a hearing on 13 June 2023, dismissed her appeal on human rights grounds (Article 8, private and family life) against a decision of the respondent of 1 October 2022 to refuse her application of 18 November 2021 for leave to remain on human rights grounds.
         Permission to appeal was granted by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Hollings-Tenant.
         It was accepted by Mr Hingora before the judge that the appellant could not succeed under the Immigration Rules, whether under para 276ADE(1) or Appendix FM.
         The judge summarised the submissions of Mr Hingora at para 5 which set out succinctly the issues that were before him. Para 5 of the judge's decision reads:
         The judge accepted that the appellant provides emotional and practical support to her mother and step-father but did not accept that there was evidence of family life beyond normal emotional ties between adults. He noted the evidence of the medical conditions of the appellant's mother and step-father but found that their health conditions were not such that they could not be met by the medical and social care services of the United Kingdom. He gave his reasons in two brief paragraphs which read as follows:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.