Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL At the Tribunal On 23 March 2021 Judgement handed down on 26 March 2021 Before
There is a mandatory requirement pursuant to rule 72(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 for an employment judge to determine whether there are reasonable prospects of a judgment being varied or revoked before seeking the other party's response and the views of the parties as to whether the matter can be determined without a hearing, potentially giving any provisional view, and deciding how the reconsideration application will be determined for the purposes of rule 72(2).
The employment judge did not err in law by refusing permission to the respondent to call expert evidence. Expert evidence can only be relied upon with the permission of the employment tribunal and should be limited to that reasonably required to resolve the issues.
The decision to determine the reconsideration application on the papers (grounds 1-3)
The determination that a hearing is not necessary in the interests of justice (ground 3)
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.