Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the respondent (also styled "the claimant") is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the respondent, likely to lead members of the public to identify the respondent. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.
I affirm this anonymity order because the respondent seeks international protection and publicity might endanger his safety.
              The respondent, hereinafter "the claimant" is a citizen of Albania. He was born in the summer of 2000. He claimed international protection on 26 April 2018. The application was refused on 2 May 2003 and he appealed that decision to the First-tier Tribunal. The appeal was allowed. The Secretary of State has permission to challenge that decision.
              It is necessary to look carefully at what the First-tier Tribunal actually did. The Judge, at paragraph 13 of her Decision and Reasons, noted the issues between the parties. Predictably these concerned whether the claimant had a well-founded fear of persecution from non-state actors and, alternatively, whether the claimant's return to Albania would be a disproportionate interference with his private and family life within the meaning of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.