Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellants: Mr Z Nasim, Counsel instructed by Direct Access, Milestone Chambers
The first and second Appellants are nationals of Pakistan, dates of birth 24 February 1987, 19 December 1989, the third Appellant�s date of birth is disputed as between 1993 and 1995 and the fourth Appellant�s date of birth is 14 January 1996. The Appellants appealed against decisions made by the Respondent dated 3 April 2014 to make removal directions, forms IS.151A having been served.
Their appeals against the Respondent�s decisions appeared to have been made, if the grounds which I have been provided with are representative of each of the Appellants, with reference to Article 8 of the ECHR.
It does not appear that there was a dispute from the grounds against the Respondent�s decisions under the Immigration Rules (the Rules), particularly paragraph 276ADE.
Their appeals came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Chana (the judge), who on 4 December 2014 dismissed them. Before the First-tier Tribunal the Appellants were represented by Mr O�Callaghan although the judge�s decision misstates the appearances.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.