Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellants are all citizens of Nigeria and members of the same family. The first and second Appellants are the father and mother respectively. The third and fourth Appellants are the children, now aged 9 and 6 years respectively.
These conjoined appeals originate in a decision dated 08 May 2014 made on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Home Department (hereinafter the � Secretary of State �). The context of the decision is apparent from the opening passage:
� �.. You have asked that your case be considered under the [ECHR] . You claim it will breach your human rights to return you to Nigeria, a country which is listed in section 94(4) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. �
The case made by the Appellants was summarised by the decision maker in the following terms:
� You have stated that removal would be a breach of your human rights because you have established private life during your time in the United Kingdom, particularly your daughter ���������.. who is now over seven years of age and has spent the whole of her life in the United Kingdom, so you do not feel it would be reasonable to expect her to leave the United Kingdom ������..
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.