Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 0207 404 1424 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr S Natas (instructed by Irvine Thanvi Natas) appeared on behalf of the Appellant The Respondent did not attend and was not represented ____________________
That question cannot simply be answered "yes" or "no" in view of the fact that an apparent postulate is the incorrect conclusion reached by the magistrates on the second question. But they were right to conclude that, by declining to remain with the CSO and pushing quickly past her, causing her to stumble backwards, the appellant assaulted her at a time when she was still acting in the execution of her duty. Accordingly, subject to deleting the word "therefore" from question 3, the answer to that question is "yes".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.