Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 20 May 2002 Before
Unhappily representation at the Employment Tribunal is not shown on the first page of the Extended Reasons. The Applicant appeared in person and the Council was represented by Mr�Hughes, of Counsel.
We have not yet reached the stage where permission is granted to appeal on the grounds that the judgment does not obtain adequate reason; that is the matter which is before us.
[The " anonymous documents" were a number of documents which were put on Mr Hardy's desk on 17 December 1998]
Then the paragraph goes on to deal with other matters about which there was evidence. It next deals with one part of the Appellant's complaint, namely that the Council said that he attended auctions regularly during office hours. He said, of that, this:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.