Civil

Investment Invoice Financing Ltd v Limehouse Board Mills Ltd

[2006] EWCA Civ 9Court of Appeal (Civil Division)2006

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

Mr. Leolin Price C.B.E, Q.C. and Mr. Thomas Williams (instructed by Key2Law LLP) for the claimant Mr. Michael McLaren Q.C. (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell) for the defendant Hearing dates : 15th December 2005 ____________________

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Civil cases

Saddiq Ahmed against Kamall Ahmed (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csoh26

Saddiq Ahmed against Kamall Ahmed (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csoh30

56 Fellows Road Limited v ABC Block Management Limited

[2026] EWCA Civ 401

ZS against TS (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csoh27

Leo Bruce Huisman against University of the Highlands and Islands and another (Court of Session)

[2026] ScotCS 2026csih17

Dr Marcus Bicknell & Anor v NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Commissioning Board

[2026] EWCA Civ 21

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

Civil

Investment Invoice Financing Ltd v Limehouse Board Mills Ltd

[2006] EWCA Civ 9Court of Appeal (Civil Division)2006

Cite this case in OSCOLA →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.