Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Stephen Davies QC and Mr Richard Ascroft (instructed by D J Murphy) for the Claimant Miss Jane Giret QC (instructed by Moon Beever) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 5-9 and 14-22 July 2004 ____________________
In an effort to avoid what is entirely unnecessary and wasteful litigation for the sake of litigation I am instructed to provide you with the following information:
It seems to me that this documentation makes the position abundantly clear and again confirms that your threatened legal action is wholly inappropriate and unnecessary. Perhaps when you have had a chance to consider these documents you would be good enough to confirm that that is also now your view.
As far as I am aware the foregoing items are the only items in respect of which you have indicated you were considering taking legal action If that is not the case please let me know as soon as possible. Otherwise it would appear to me that we have complied with your requests fully and I take it you will now rescind the threat of legal action."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.