Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The application for permission to appeal was made by the Secretary of State but I shall refer to the parties as they were described before the First-tier Tribunal that is Miss Dapilaga, the appellant, and the Secretary of State as the respondent.
The appellant is a citizen of the Philippines born on 11 September1979 and she appealed against the decision to refuse to vary her leave to remain in the United Kingdom and to remove her by way of directions under Section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006.
The appellant was initially granted leave to remain as a Tier 4 (General) Student but her leave was curtailed to expire on 20 August 2013 and on that date she applied for leave to remain as a partner.
In a Reasons for Refusal Letter the Secretary of State noted that the appellant had applied as a partner as defined in paragraph GEN1.2 of Appendix FM but it appeared that she had only been living with her partner at Atiszamir since January 2013 and therefore did not fulfil the definition of a partner and could not meet the requirements of Section R-LTRP.
The application was refused under paragraph D-LTRP.1.1 of the Immigration Rules.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.