Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
By an Order dated 13 October 2015, the Court of Appeal remitted the appeal of the appellant to the Upper Tribunal for redetermination.
By a letter dated 12 February 2016, the appellant's representatives, TRP Solicitors Ltd, informed the Upper Tribunal that the appeal had become academic because the appellant had been granted entry clearance in response to a fresh application for entry clearance. They therefore sought leave to withdraw the appeal on the appellant's behalf.
Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 (the "UT Rules") provides for a party to withdraw its case before the Upper Tribunal, with the consent of the Tribunal.
The Upper Tribunal hereby consents to the withdrawal by the Appellant of her case. Accordingly, the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal A J Parker stands unopposed. The appeal of the Appellant to the Upper Tribunal is therefore dismissed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.