Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
EDT; whether self-dismissal by Claimant; acceptance of repudiation by Respondent amounting to dismissal.� Communicating dismissal.
Held : Claim in time; SGP not applicable: complaint of continuing breach of DDA and right to holiday pay continuing after repeal of DRR, see para 3 2008 Order.
This matter is proceeding in the Watford Employment Tribunal.� The parties are Mr Zulhayir, Claimant, and J J Food Service Limited, Respondent.� This is an appeal by the Claimant; with the permission of HHJ Richardson, against the reserved Judgment of Employment Judge Mahoney, sitting alone at a Pre-Hearing Review (PHR) held on 6 September 2010, striking out his claim against the Respondent.� That Judgment with Reasons was promulgated on 23 September.
The facts are important in this case and are not materially in dispute.� They are very helpfully set out by the Employment Judge at paragraph 3 of this Reasons and we should recite them.
�3.1 From evidence before it, the tribunal makes the following findings of fact.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.