Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, Mr JA is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of Mr JA, likely to lead members of the public to identify him. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
      For the sake of continuity and ease of reference, we shall refer to the parties as they were before the First-tier Tribunal. Therefore, the Secretary of State is once again "the Respondent" and Mr JA is "the Appellant".
      The appeals of the family members were dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Dilks ("Judge Dilks") in a decision promulgated on 22 February 2019 (PA/06566/2017, PA/06560/2017, and PA/06562/2017). That decision was not successfully challenged. In summary, Judge Dilks made the following findings of fact in relation to the Appellant's wife and two of their children:
(b)    their evidence about the experiences of undocumented Bidoons in Kuwait was vague;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.