Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(1)����� The tribunal grants the application of the claimant for leave to amend her claim, and it is so amended, to include claims pursuant to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, as amended, namely:-
(a)����� that the respondent has discriminated against the claimant by failing to make reasonable adjustments, pursuant to Section 4A of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, as amended, in relation to how the respondent applied its sick leave provision criterion or practice to the claimant prior to the claimant resigning from her employment, as set out in the claimant�s representative�s letter dated 9 October 2013 ; and
(b)����� that the respondent harassed the claimant, pursuant to Section 3B of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, as amended, relying on the same facts as set out in the claimant�s claim form in relation to her sex discrimination claim.
(2)����� The tribunal refuses the respondent�s application to strike-out the claimant�s claim for failure to comply with an �Unless Order� made by the tribunal on 26 November 2013 .
(3)����� The tribunal orders the claimant to pay to the respondent the sum of �200.00 in respect of the respondent�s costs of the postponement of the pre-hearing review hearing on 22 November 2013 .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.