Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The appellant is a citizen of India born on 9 th June 1975. He came to the UK as a Tier 4 student migrant and was granted indefinite leave to remain on 31 st January 2014. He was convicted of kidnapping his daughter, a British citizen, and removing her to India when she was 8 years old on 28 th March 2017 and sentenced to two years' imprisonment. A deportation order was made against him on 1 st March 2018.
             The matter now comes before me to determine whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law, and is so whether any such error was material and whether the decision of the First-tier Tribunal should be set aside.
             In the grounds of appeal and in oral submissions from Mr Karim it is argued, in short summary, that the First-tier Tribunal erred in law as follows.
             Thirdly, it is argued that there was a failure to fully consider the best interest of the appellant's child. It is found that it would not be unduly harsh for the appellant's daughter to receive gifts from India at paragraphs 63 to 64 of the decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.