Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              We begin by considering the First-tier Tribunal's Decision and Reasons. We consider exactly what the First-tier Tribunal did.
              The judge found that by 31 December 2020 the claimant and his wife had been living together for six months and had formed a clear intention to marry. They did in fact marry in March 2021 and were living together when the case came before the First-tier Tribunal Judge.
              In the circumstances it is unsurprising that the judge found that they were in a durable relationship and this finding has not been challenged.
              The judge then set out the definition of "durable partner" given in Annex 1 to Appendix EU of HC 395. This part of the Immigration Rules has attracted criticism elsewhere and we understand it has been amended, although that is not relevant to the task before us.
              At the material time it stated:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.