Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is the Appellants� appeal against the decision of Judge Myers made following a hearing at Bradford on 15 th April 2014.
The Appellants are husband and wife, citizens of Pakistan, born on 5 th May 1962 and 3 rd March 1968 respectively.
They applied to come to the UK as visitors but were refused on 22 nd January 2013.
The Entry Clearance Officer was not satisfied that the first Appellant's circumstances were as claimed. He had provided affidavits dated 1998 and 2000 which could not demonstrate his current circumstances. The valuation reports were dated 2006 and the copy of his pension book indicated a sum being paid different from the amount claimed. The bank statement showed deposits inconsistent with his claimed income. In particular sums recently deposited equate to over 49 months� declared income from all sources before any living deductions.
Additionally, the Entry Clearance Officer was not satisfied that the Sponsor, the first Appellant�s brother, was in a position to maintain and accommodate him.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.