Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(DAR Transcript of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MRS J PINKHAM (instructed by Messrs Frank Jones & Harley, 87 St Giles Street, NORTHAMPTON, NN1 1JN) appeared on behalf of the Appellant mother The Respondent father appeared in person. ____________________
That was a comparison with the work which she was doing at the date of her pregnancy. She had said in the previous paragraph that at the time of her pregnancy she was doing menial work stacking shelves.
We do not have a transcript of what occurred on 24�February. The only thing we do know is that the mother was not recalled and did not give further oral evidence.
So insofar as the CAFCASS officer expressed any reservations as to her capacity to cope, it was not upon the depth of the mother's commitment to return but upon the depth of her hope as the sustaining factor in the run-up to trial.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.