Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.
              The appellant is a Kurdish citizen of Iran, born in February 2005, who claims to face a risk of persecution in Iran because:
(a)            the Iranian authorities have an interest in him because of his suspected involvement with the KDPI; and
(b)           his sur place activities.
              The reason the appellant claims the Iranian authorities have an adverse interest in him is that he escaped capture when a lorry that he was working on was stopped on suspicion of connections to the KDPI. He claims that since his escape it has not been safe for him to remain in Iran as he is suspected of being a KDPI supporter. Amongst other things, he claims that his father told him that the authorities visited his village to make enquires about him.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.