Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Act: Sheldon, Advocate for the defenders and appellants, instructed by HJB, solicitors
1b. Was I entitled to repel the defenders objections to the line of questioning in relation to the issue of the pursuer's impecuniosity?
In respect of the said hire charges was I entitled to find that the pursuer at the time of hire of the replacement car impecunious (Lagdon v O'Connor [2004] 1 AC 1067 ?)
Was I entitled to find that the correspondence between the parties prior to proof amounted to extra judicial admissions only rather than an agreement to settle.
On the facts stated was I entitled to grant decree for payment in favour of the Pursuer?"
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.