Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              This is the remaking in the Upper Tribunal of a decision on the appeal of the appellant against the decision of the respondent on 30 October 2020 refusing him international protection. The appeal was previously heard and allowed but I set aside that decision because I found it was an unlawful decision.
              My full reasons for finding error of law have been sent to the parties but the short point is that I found that although the First-tier Tribunal Judge directed herself to apply the decision in Devaseelan [2002] UKAIT 000702 she did not follow that direction and had essentially redecided the appeal.
              Before me it is for the appellant to prove his case but he is entitled to protection if he can show that he faces a real risk of serious harm.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.