“House of Lords clarifies direct discrimination test in employment cases”
Chief Inspector Shamoon, a female police officer, was removed from conducting staff appraisals following complaints about her approach. She claimed this constituted sex discrimination, arguing male colleagues in similar positions retained their appraisal duties despite also receiving complaints.
Whether the removal of appraisal duties constituted direct sex discrimination, and what approach should be taken to determining less favourable treatment in discrimination cases.
The appeal was dismissed. The House of Lords held that there was no direct discrimination, but established that courts should focus on the reason for treatment rather than requiring a strict comparator-based approach.
This case fundamentally altered the approach to proving direct discrimination, moving away from rigid comparator requirements towards examining the true reasons for treatment. It remains the leading authority on direct discrimination methodology.
You're reading the free summary of Shamoon v Chief Constable. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
OSCOLA Citation
Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11, [2003] ICR 337
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.