Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             In a skeleton argument dated 24 November 2023, the respondent conceded that the decision of FtT Judge Prudham, dismissing the appellant's appeal, errs in law, and that the appellant's application to the respondent met the requirements of the EU Settlement Scheme, EU11.
             In light of that concession, the hearing which was due to take place on 1 December 2023 was vacated. It has come to attention, however, that no decision has been issued. It may be that parties have regulated the practical outcome between themselves; but to dispose of the appeal, this decision is now made.
            The decision of the FtT is set aside. The appeal, as originally brought to the FtT, is allowed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.