Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Petitioner: Bryce; Drummond Miller LLP (for Bilkus and Boyle, Solicitors, Glasgow)
[5] The further submissions were the letter of 5 June 2009 enclosing certain photocopies of letters. The first bore to be a translation into English (from Pushto) of a letter dated 1 March 2008 from Hezb-e-Islami requesting him to join "the Jihad against the infidel invaders and the puppet government of Karzai". It concluded;
"Give us the weapons and ammunitions which were kept by your father because we need them. Below the details of the weapons:
"Where a human rights or asylum claim has been refused or withdrawn or treated as withdrawn under paragraph 333C of these Rules and any appeal relating to that claim is no longer pending, the decision maker will consider any further submissions and, if rejected, will then determine whether they amount to a fresh claim. The submissions will amount to a fresh claim if they are significantly different from the material that has previously been considered. The submissions will only be significantly different if the content:
(ii) taken together with the previously considered material, created a realistic prospect of success, notwithstanding its rejection.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.