Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
"You should note that because this application for entry clearance has been refused under paragraph 320 (7A) of the immigration rules, any future applications may [original emphasis] also be refused under paragraph 320 (7B) of the immigration rules (subject to the requirements set out in paragraph 320 (7C))."
"What we have here is a mother, born in 1962, who wishes to see, in effect, her son and inevitably her daughter and grandchild. It is important, I think, to look at the family situation overall in making that initial assessment. It does seem to me that the nature of those relationships, both parental and grandparental, are such that it can sensibly and properly be said that article 8 (1) is engaged. There is, in other words, family life in existence between the appellant and her adult children and also with the grandchild."
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.