Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant or any member of his family. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court. This order is made on account of the fact that the appellant's claim is for international protection.
         The issue before the Upper Tribunal in this case is whether the appellant would be at risk of serious harm on account of his "sur place" activities and therefore be entitled to protection under either the Refugee Convention or Article 3 ECHR. For the reasons which follow, I conclude that he would be at risk of persecution and allow his appeal under the Refugee Convention.
       The Appellant appeals against the Respondent's decision dated 13 October 2020 refusing his asylum and human rights claim.
       The Appellant's appeal now comes before me to be remade pursuant to s.12(2)(b)(ii) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.