Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
FINDS IN FACT AND LAW; that the father is in contempt of court in respect of his wilful and intentional failure to obtempter the court order of 26 th January 2006 as amended and that as follows;
By picking T up from school on the 14 th September and returning him after 8.00pm .
Seperatim, the father if in contempt of court by an abuse of process in that he cause and permitted pleadings which were untrue, and which he knew to be untrue, to be lodged with the court.
[1] This is another unhappy chapter in relation to these long running proceedings. It is worth putting this Minute Hearing in context as Mr B (and both of his sisters who gave evidence) complained inter alia about the length of time that this Court action had taken (they attributed 7 years to it).
[2] This particular chapter starts in relation to the Decree dated 24 January 2006 . That Decree was granted as a result of the signing of a Joint Minute. The arrangements in finding in fact no.2 were agreed
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.