Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant appealed against the respondent's decision to refuse a human rights claim and to revoke refugee status in the context of deportation proceedings.
The appellant appeals the First-tier Tribunal decision on the following grounds:
(i) The judge was wrong to refer to paragraph 399A of the immigration rules, which only applied to revocation of protection status where the asylum application was made on or after 21 October 2004: see Dang (Refugee - query revocation - Article 3) [2013] UKUT 43 .
(ii) The judge erred by placing too much weight on the evidence given by the appellant's ex-wife in a previous application when she did not give evidence at the hearing and her evidence could not be tested.
(iii) In assessing the reliability of information contained in the pre-sentence report the judge failed to take into account the circumstances in which the interview took place, which included the use of an Arabic rather than a Somali interpreter.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.