Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In this appeal the Appellant is referred to as the ECO and the Respondent is referred to as the claimant.
The claimant, a national of Pakistan, date of birth 12 April 1993, appealed against the ECO�s decision dated 27 February 2013 to refuse entry clearance as a partner under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules, with particular reference to paragraphs EC-P.1.1 and EC-P.1.3 of Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules.
That appeal came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Sangha who, on 14 March 2014, allowed the appeal on Article 8 ECHR grounds, but dismissed the appeal under the Immigration Rules.
Permission to appeal that decision was given by Designated Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Dearden on 24 April 2014.
The ECO�s criticisms can be put very shortly. It was not disputed that the claimant had not met the requirements of the Immigration Rules in failing to provide the documents and accordingly the application was properly refused under paragraph EC-P.1.1(b) of Appendix FM of the Rules.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.