Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             No anonymity direction was made by the First-tier Tribunal . There was no application before us for such a direction. Having considered the facts of the appeals including the circumstances of the appellant, we see no reason for making a such direction.
            The Appellant appeals with permission against the decision (the decision) of First-tier Tribunal Judge Davey (the Judge) prepared on 10 February 2023 and promulgated on 21 February 2024, dismissing his appeal against the Respondent's decision dated 21 July 2021 to refuse leave to remain based on his private life.
            The Appellant is a national of Malaysia born in August 1970. The Appellant claims to have resided continuously in the United Kingdon (UK) since 6 December 1996.
            On 29 December 2020 the Appellant applied for leave to remain under the Private Life Route under the Immigration Rules on the grounds of long residence.
            The application was refused by the Respondent in a decision dated 21 July 2021. The Appellant appealed the refusal decision on the basis of his private life in the UK as he claimed he meets the requirements of Paragraph 276ADE(1) of the Immigration Rules, in particular (Paragraph 276ADE(1)(iii)) for a grant of leave on the basis that he had resided continuously in the United Kingdom (UK) for a period in excess of 20 years.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.