Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE LEWISON LORD JUSTICE LINDBLOM and LORD JUSTICE FLAUX ____________________
MR HUGO CUDDIGAN QC (instructed by Kempner & Partners LLP) for the Appellant MR DOUGLAS CAMPBELL QC (instructed by Gowling WLG (UK) LLP) for the Respondent Hearing date: 13 June 2018 ____________________
i) The distinction between a PSB and the limb was a matter of judgment. The PSB must be "appreciably" beyond and distinct from material at the outer ends of the cylinders and "clearly" asymmetric to the eye.
ii) There were no hard and fast rules for deciding what was comprised in a PSB and what was not.
iii) The visual clues in the patent were far too imprecise to be satisfactory, but the task was just about workable.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.