Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appeals of the appellants were dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Beach.
The judge said she must therefore consider whether there are serious and compelling family or other considerations which make it undesirable for the second and third appellants to be excluded from the UK.
After hearing submissions from both parties, I found in respect of the appeals under the Immigration Rules that the judge did not err in law for the reasons given below. I shall come to the Article 8 issue later.
With regard to the second and third appellants, I do not find that the judge erred in law in finding that there are no serious and compelling family or other considerations which make their exclusion undesirable. The judge considered all the evidence before her and made findings which were sustainable and open to her.
I find that in respect of the Immigration Rules that the judge�s findings disclose no arguable error of law and her decision dismissing all three appeals shall stand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.