Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE SEDLEY LORD JUSTICE PITCHFORD and LORD JUSTICE GROSS ____________________
(Transcript of the Handed Down Judgment of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY Tel No: 020 7404 1400, Fax No: 020 7404 1424 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
For present purposes this corresponds with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, and I see no need to elaborate it.
The second question, Lord Bingham explained [at �18], "reflects the consistent case law of the Strasbourg court, holding that conduct must attain a minimum level of severity to engage the operation of the Convention: see, for example, Costello-Roberts v United Kingdom [1993] 19 EHRR 112 )".
It is noticeable that the only principles repeatedly applied in such cases are those stated most recently by the Third Section in Haghighi v Netherlands :
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.