Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant was discriminated against on grounds of race and was unfairly dismissed.� The tribunal awards �53,596 �� ��compensation.
The claimant was represented by Mr D Sharp, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by John Ross & Son Solicitors.
The respondent was represented by Mr P Bloch, Barrister-at-Law, of EEF Northern Ireland .
(1) What was the reason for the claimant�s dismissal?� Was that reason one of the potentially fair reasons outlined in the legislation; was dismissal fair in all the circumstances of the case and in particular was the dismissal fair when compared to the treatment of Mr McC?
(2) Was the claimant�s dismissal an act of race discrimination and/or victimisation when compared to the treatment of a comparator whether real or hypothetical?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.