Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The written reasons are being distributed on the strict understanding that in any report, no person may be identified by name or location (Other than a person identified by name in the reasons themselves) and that in particular the anonymity of the children and the adult members of their family must be strictly preserved
I have therefore set a new timetable for the proceedings relating to F and G but all parties have asked me to deal with K�s case to a conclusion.� Although the grandmother was originally hoping to care for K as well as his two half-siblings she has very sensibly decided that as the fostering panel has deemed her unsuitable to care for G and F she should not pursue her wish to care for K as well and so once again she does not actively oppose the applications.
I am told by the Children�s Guardian that K has made good progress whilst in foster care and is now feeding better although he still suffers with some reflux at times.� Furthermore, treatment of his left foot is progressing well and he is able to stand and walk with assistance.� He is described as a happy and contented child who readily engages with anyone who will play with him.� He also appears to be developing a strong bond with his foster carers and their own children.� He is meeting his developmental milestones.
The mother�s sister and her partner also applied to be considered as carers for K but after receiving a negative viability assessment they have also decided not to pursue an application.� Again, I acknowledge how difficult this must have been and have no doubt that K is loved by all members of his family.
I am therefore satisfied that K cannot be returned to his mother either now or in the foreseeable future and there are no other family members able to care for him.� In view of K�s age he needs to receive consistent, stable and loving care so that he can meet his full potential and decisions about his future need to be made as soon as possible.� I therefore make a care order to X Council so that they can pursue their plans for permanency as set out in the care plan at CP33-43.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.