Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court
            The appellant appeals from the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Le Grys promulgated on 13 November 2023 ("the Decision"). By the Decision, Judge Le Grys dismissed the appellant's appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State made on 15 July 2021 to refuse his protection claim made on 7 November 2019.
            In the refusal decision, the respondent did not accept that the appellant had problems with the Turkish authorities because of his suspected support for the Gulen Movement. This was because there were various internal and external inconsistencies in his account including the fact that the arrest warrant and the Public Prosecution records that he had tendered in support of his claim contained dates which were inconsistent with the date he had given for when he said that the police had first raided the family home.
            The appellant's appeal came before Judge Le Grys sitting at Newport on 8 November 2023. Both parties were legally represented. The Judge received oral evidence from the appellant who was cross-examined and answered some questions from the Judge.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.