Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I find an error of law in the decision of the Judge as to the Immigration Rules and that part of the Judge's decision is set aside. To qualify for entry clearance, the Appellant must show that both parts of paragraph E-ECDR.3 of Appendix FM are satisfied and it is not in dispute that paragraph E-ECDR.3.2 is not so satisfied.
The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal under the Immigration Rules did involve the making of an error on a point of law. I set aside that decision.
The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal under Article 8 ECHR did not involve the making of an error on a point of law. That decision is not set aside.
I remake the decision in the appeal under the Immigration Rules by dismissing it.
The First-tier Tribunal did not make an order for anonymity. I was not asked to do so and indeed find no reason to do so.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.