Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR R PEZZANI and MR K HARRIS (instructed by Inyama & Company, London NW5 1LX) appeared on behalf of the CLAIMANT MR T WEISSELBERG (instructed by RadcliffesLeBrasseur, London SW1P 3SJ) appeared on behalf of the DEFENDANT ____________________
That was one of two possible orders available for deletion by the panel. The other pro forma order, to the effect that the patient should be discharged, had been deleted. Beneath the wording of the order appeared the handwritten name and signature of each of the three members of the panel who had conducted the review. It is therefore common ground that the decision in question was unanimous. However, in the section of the form that is headed "REASONS FOR DECISION - MUST BE COMPLETED " appeared the following:
As indicated by Miss Oliver, the relevant documents were attached to her witness statement.
Mr Pezzani referred me to each of the authorities referred to by Priestly J and demonstrated to my satisfaction that Priestly J's summary of those cases is entirely accurate, as one would expect.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.