Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr J Wells, Counsel instructed by Hudson McKenzie, Solicitors
Although the appellant in these proceedings is the Secretary of State, I refer to the parties as they were before the First-tier Tribunal ("FtT).
The appellant is a citizen of India born on 25 November 1950. On 1 August 2013 she made an application for entry clearance as a dependent relative under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules. That application was refused in a decision dated 30 September 2013. The application was in fact made at the same time as that of her husband, Gurcharan Singh Kochar. Sadly, the appellant's husband died after the application was made.
The appellant's appeal against the respondent's decision to refuse entry clearance came before a panel of the FtT consisting of Judges Church and Kamara, whereby the appeal was allowed. The respondent appeals against the decision of the FtT asserting errors of law in the FtT's decision.
The FtT noted that it was accepted on behalf of the respondent that the appellant met the requirements of E-ECDR.2.4 (parent of sponsor requiring long-term personal care to perform everyday tasks as a result of age, illness or disability).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.