Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Claimants: Ms M Malhotra (Counsel instructed by Chipatiso Associates LLP)
For ease of reference I shall refer to the parties as the �Secretary of State� who is the Appellant and to the �Claimants�.
This is an appeal against a Decision and Reasons of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Wellesley-Cole) promulgated on 24 October 2014 in which the Tribunal allowed the appeals against a decision made by the Secretary of State on 29 January 2014 to remove the Claimants administratively on the grounds that their human rights claim was refused.
The Claimants are all members of the same family and are citizens of Sri Lanka. The first claimant is Mr M U whose date of birth is 11 December 1978, his dependent wife is Mrs F M whose date of birth is 9 November 1988 is the second and main Claimant and the third Claimant is their 2� year old daughter whose date of birth is 5 May 2012.
The Secretary of State took into account that the Claimant entered the UK on 8 October 2010 as a student on a visa valid until 29 February 2012. His application for leave to remain on human rights grounds was refused without a right of appeal on 6 April 2013. Notice of liability to removal was served on the parties on 11 November 2013. Further representations were received on 22 January 2014 on the grounds of family and private life.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.