Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellants are citizens of Nepal. The first-named appellant (hereinafter referred to as �the appellant�) is 65 years of age and applied for entry clearance under the Immigration Rules. Her husband, the second-named appellant, also applied at the same time but sadly he died on October 14, 2014 (prior to this hearing but after the original hearing). The respondent refused both applications on January 20, 2014 on the grounds they did not satisfy the requirements of Appendix FM Section E-ECDR.
The appellant (and her husband) appealed under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 on February 17, 2014.
The matter came before Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Vaudin d�Imecourt (hereinafter referred to as the �FtTJ�) on June 18, 2014 and in a decision promulgated on June 20, 2014 he dismissed the appellants� appeals under both the Immigration Rules and article 8 ECHR.
The appellant (and her husband) lodged grounds of appeal on July 10, 2014. Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Davidge refused permission to appeal on September 2, 2014 finding that the FtTJ made findings that were open to him.
The appellant (and her husband) renewed their grounds to the Upper Tribunal and on January 8, 2015 Upper Tribunal Judge Chalkley granted permission finding it was arguable the FtTJ had erred.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.