Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appeal is allowed.� The Tribunal finds that there are mistakes of law in ISA�s decision dated 3 December 2010 and sets it aside .
The Tribunal remits this matter to ISA to make a fresh decision in reliance on the facts as found by the Tribunal as set out below.�
The Tribunal directs that the Appellant must remain on both barred lists pending a fresh decision by ISA.
4.� The Tribunal directs that there is to be no publication of any matter likely to lead members of the public directly or indirectly to identify any witness or any person who was a child at the time of any of the allegations referred to in this decision (rule 14(1)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/2698)).
This is an appeal to the Upper Tribunal against a decision of the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) about the inclusion of B in both the vulnerable adults� and the children�s barred lists, maintained by ISA under section 2 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (�the 2006 Act�).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.