Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant, ES, is a female citizen of Pakistan. By a decision promulgated on 9 May 2017, I found that the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law such that its decision fell to be set aside. My reasons for so finding were as follows:
The appellant, E S, was born in 1986 and is a female citizen of Pakistan. She appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Mensah) against the decisions of the respondent of 1 and 11 March 2016 to revoke her refugee status and to refuse her further leave to remain. The First-tier Tribunal, in a decision promulgated on 28 October 2016, dismissed the appeal. The appellant now appeals, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
The domestic circumstances of this appellant have a complex history. The appeal turned, in part, upon the state of the relationship between the appellant and her partner which had, in the past, involved allegations of domestic violence.
I find, therefore, that the findings of fact as regards the appellant's relationship with her partner and children are sound. In particular, I find that the following findings shall remain in any event:
I find that the judge's finding at [53] is also sustained. Here, the judge found that the appellant and H are in a subsisting relationship and have been since 2008 and that H is capable of working in Pakistan should the family live together and to provide for the family financially.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.