Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Charlotte Hadfield (instructed by Sinclairslaw) for the Claimant Zoe Gannon (instructed by Hampshire Legal Services) for the Defendant Hearing date: 13 October 2020 ____________________
In R (DS) v Wolverhampton City Council [2017] EWHC 1660 (Admin) , Garnham J summarised the position by reference to five propositions, at paragraph 45 of his judgment:
The contention that the Defendant took the wrong considerations into account and/or reached a conclusion which was irrational
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.