Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant likely to lead members of the public to identify him . Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The Appellant is a national of Iraq born in 1989. He appeals with permission against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Lodato) dated the 23 rd July 2021.
             The Appellant did not attend the hearing before Judge Lodato in July 2021. He now says that was because he was unaware of it.
             The Appellant also made a fresh human rights claim, on the basis that he was, at that point, five years into a relationship with a British woman who would be unable to safely go and live in Iraq with him. That element of his appeal was dismissed for a lack of evidence that the relationship was subsisting: "without her evidence, I am left in a state of uncertainty about whether the relationship continues to this day and whether they are currently living together".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.