Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The sheriff, having resumed consideration of the cause, Repels the pursuers' tenth plea-in-law and the defender's third plea-in-law; Sustains the pursuers' sixth to ninth and eleventh pleas-in-law; excludes from probation the Defender's answers in each of Answers 2,3,4,5 and 7; and
(1) Grants decree against the defender for payment to the pursuers of the sum of TWENTY TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY ONE POUNDS AND FORTY ONE PENCE STERLING (�22,381.41) with interest thereon at the rate of eight per centum per annum from the date of citation until payment, all in terms of crave 1;
(2) Grants decree against the defender for payment to the pursuers of the sum of ONE HUNDRED AND SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY TWO POUNDS STERLING (�106,192.00) with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from the date of citation until payment, all in terms of crave 2;
(3) Grants decree against the defender for payment to the pursuers of the sum of FORTY SEVEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED AND TWENTY POUNDS AND FIFTY THREE PENCE STERLING (�47,620.53) with interest thereon at the rate of eight per cent per annum from the date of citation until payment, all in terms of crave 3;
(6) Assigns 6 September 2013 at 10.00 AM in Aberdeen Sheriff Court as a hearing on expenses and to determine further procedure in relation to the pursuers' fourth crave.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.