Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In this case the Secretary of State for the Home Department appeals against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 27 January 2014 whereby it allowed the appeal of Mr Rajesh Reddy Sanga against the Secretary of State�s refusal to grant him leave to remain as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrant under the points-based system.
The Secretary of State stated that four of the documents which had been supplied with the application did not comply with the provisions of paragraph 41-SD of Appendix A to the Immigration Rules. In that:
�...is not acceptable because it does not confirm that the institution is regulated by the appropriate regulatory body, does not state your name, does not confirm the amount of money being made available to you from the third party�s funds, does not confirm that the money can be transferred to the UK�.
�.....you have provided are not acceptable because they are for an account that does not state your name as having access to the funds�.
�...you have submitted is not acceptable because it does not contain your signature�.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.