Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr Gilbert, instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Partners, Solicitors
The appellant, Andrzej Augusciak was born on 31 January 1983 and is a male citizen of Poland. He had appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (Judge R A Jones; Mr B Bompas) against a decision of the respondent dated 21 March 2012 to make a deportation order against him on the ground that his removal from the United Kingdom was conducive to the public good. The First-tier Tribunal, in a determination promulgated on 20 June 2014, dismissed the appeal. The appellant now appeals, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
Designated Judge Zucker gave permission to appeal on 9 July 2014 in the following terms:
The grounds submit that the appellant has spent time in a United Kingdom prison during extradition proceedings which were found by the High Court to be flawed. The appellant contends that his deportation would violate his human rights because, if deported, rather than being extradited, he would not receive credit in Poland, to where he would be returned, in respect of the time spent in prison in the United Kingdom against the sentence imposed by the Polish courts.
In its response under Rule 24 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the respondent submitted:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.